Appendix ‘K’

 

GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY

Kashmere Gate, Delhi – 110006

 

 

 

 

GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

Annexure – I :      PARAMETERS OF AFFILIATION FOR SETTING UP OF NEW INSTITUTES STARTING FROM THE ACADEMIC SESSION 2000-2001.

 

Annexure – II:     PARAMETERS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF SANCTIONED INTAKE/ NEW PROGRAMMES INT THE EXISTING AFFILIATED INSTITUTES STARTING FROM THE ACADEMIC SESSION 2000-2001.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note :-

 

(i)                Annexure I to be evaluated by the Assessment Committee for new institutions.

(ii)             Annexure I & II (both) to be evaluated by the Assessment Committee for enhancement of intake/ new programmes in the institutions.

 


 

Quantification of Parameters For affiliation of new institutions/ programmes

Starting from  the academic session 2000 – 2001

 

 

I.                   Introduction about the Institute/ Society

 

(1)               Name and Address of the Institution/ Society  :-

 

Telephone No.  :

Fax No.              :

E-Mail                 :

 

(2)               Year of Establishment  :

 

 

(3)               Name and Address of the Head of the Institution  :

 

 

 

 

Trust                Society

 
(4)       (a)        Whether the applicant is registered as a Society or Trust

 

 

 

 

 
 


(b)               Specify Society Registration Act or Trust No.

 

 

 
 


(c)                Date and Registration No. of the Society / Trust

 

 

(5)               Courses for which affiliation sought :-

 

 

Serial No.

Courses

Proposed Intake

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-1-

 


Annexure – I

 

II.   General Standards (80)

 

 

Rating Scale

 

 

Rating by Assessment Committee

 

1.

Background of the Chairman/ President & Executive Secretary

0-10

Eminent Educationist, Professional, Technologist, Administrators should be given weightage.

 

 

2.

 

Background of other members

0-5

-do-

 

3.

Track Record/ Reputation of Society/ Trust

0-15

Higher weightage to be given to reputed Societies running similar professional programmes, place-ment position scenario etc.

 

 

4.

Financial Position/ Statement of the Society/ Trust

0-10

Assets and Liabilities should be taken into consideration.

 

 

5.

Availability of own Land

0-20

 

According to the norms and standards prescribed by the course/ programme.

 

 

6.

Building in possession

0-20

Weightage to be given after considering the following :-

(i)        Own building

(ii)       Rented building

(iii)     Independently to be utilised for running the programme.

(iv)     Permanent site available

(v)      Location details ie. in a hygienic and non-congested area.

(vi)     Support service like water, Electricity, Communication, Canteen etc.

(vii)   Conducive to conduct of education in a proper atmosphere.

(viii)Easy accessibility by public transport to students and staff.

 

 

III.  Specific Standards for the Proposed Programme (140)

 

1.

Theory Rooms, Lecture halls, tutorials, laboratories and workshops

0-20

(numbers to be awarded taking into consideration the intake of students, adequacy, ventilation, natural light, size, state of the Art furniture availability, Room size with reference to University norms.)

 

 

 

Rating Scale

 

Rating by Assessment Committee

2.

Computer Centre accommodation

0-10

(Lab size, ventilation, temperature control, state of the Art furniture availability, etc. to be seen).

 

 

3.

Computer configuration

0-20

(Computer configuration to be checked and marks given taking into consideration the level of configuration, licensed software status available.)

 

4

General office infrastructure, availability of modern gadgets and installation.

-         Internet/ ISDM, fax facilities

 

0-10

 

 

5.  LIBRARY

 

(a)

Accommodation

0-10

(whether independent or shared, Availability and quality of furniture, Library management details etc., easy access to students)

 

 

(b)

Availability of books, journals etc.

0-20

(Number of books/ volumes relevant to the programmes, titles, Number of National or International journals

 

6.       FACULTY

 

(a)

Profile of Director/ PPL of the institution

 

0-15

 

 

 

To be evaluated taking into consideration the University laid norms.

 

(b)

Profile of the faculty

 

 

0-15

 

(c)

Percentage of faculty in position or identified for appointment

 

0-10

 

 

 

(d)

Provision of extra curricular and co-curricular activities, play ground,  Auditorium, Seminar/ Committee rooms etc.

 

0-10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV.  VISION OF THE INSTITUTE/ INDUSTRY-INTERACTION  Etc. (30)

 

 

Rating Scale

 

Rating by Assessment Committee

(1)

Profile of growth/ Vision of the institute/ Project report preparation (including manpower projection)

 

0-15

 

 

(2)

Liaison or Interaction with Industry initiated or finalised or planned.

 

0-15

 

 

 

Total    : 

250

 

 

 

 


Analysis by the Assessment Committee:

 

            Written comments on strengths and weaknesses of the proposal and identified deficiencies which must be covered before affiliation is granted.  (Significant deficiencies must be listed numerically).

 

 

 

Signature of members of

Assessment Committee

 

REPORT OF SUB-COMMITTEE

 

Analysis by Sub-Committee based on the :-

 

(i)                  Project report submitted by the Institute

(ii)                Evaluation of Assessment Committee report

(iii)               Presentation by the management of the Institutes, if necessary.

 

Recommendations of the Sub-Committee :-

 

 

 

 

 

Signature of members of

Sub-Committee

 

 

 

 


Annexure - II

 

V.   FOR  CONTINUATION OF AFFILIATION OF EXISTING INSTITUTIONS  :

(Enhancement of sanctioned intake/ new programmes in existing institutions)

 


 

Rating Scale

 

Remarks

Rating of Assessment Committee

1.

Institutes/ Liaison with Industries/ other leading institutes

 

 

 

 

 

(a)Industrial visits of students/ Industrial training

 

(b)         Expert/ Eminent professionals invited for Lecturers

 

(c)Project work undertaken for Industry.

 

 

0-5

 

 

 

0-5

 

 

 

0-5

One visit per month for students of every discipline laid down in addition to industrial training.

 

One Lecture every 15 days in emerging areas relevant to programmes.

 

At least one project by students of final year.

 

2.      Faculty Position/ Status of Staff Development Programme :

 

 

(a)Students :  Faculty ratio

0-10

Part time staff should not be taken into account

 

 

(b)    Student : Technical Supporting Staff ratio

0-5

--

 

 

 

 

(c)Faculty sent for induction/ Refresher training

 

 

0-5

-         Minimum two weeks of Induction training laid down

-         One week of refresher training for existing staff.

 

 

 

(d)    Faculty exposed to industry

 

 

(e)Laboratory/ Workshop staff trained during the year

 

 

0-5

 

 

 

0-5

10% of the faculty to be deputed for industrial training of not less than one month.

 

-         One week Induction training for new staff.

-         Two weeks skill upgradation training for existing staff.

 

 

3.

Students Performance

0-10

 

-         Passed percentage

-         Passed with distinction/ Passed in first division, Students drop-out, etc. should be taken into consideration.

 

 

 

 


 

Rating Scale

 

Remarks

Rating of Assessment Committee

4.

Placement details

 

 

 

 

 

(a)Campus Interviews conducted

(b)    Gainful employment of the students qualifying

 

0-5

 

 

0-15

Of at  least 10 establishment to be arranged for a batch of 30 students

 

5.

Seminars/ workshops/ conventions conducted by the institutions

 

0-5

Minimum one seminar/ workshop for every programme of studies

 

 

6.

Paper Publication by Staff

0-5

At least one paper per five teachers to be published  in leading journals.

 

 

7.

Consultancy service by Staff

0-5

At least one project during the course duration for each programme.

 

 

 

8.

Response of the students regarding teaching programme, faculty and general attitude of management

 

0-10

Students at random could be interviewed.

 

 

Total  :

100

 

 

 

                                    Grand Total  : 350

 


Analysis by the Assessment Committee:

 

            Written comments on strengths and weaknesses of the proposal and identified deficiencies which must be covered before affiliation is granted.  (Significant deficiencies must be listed numerically).

 

 

Signature of members of

Assessment Committee

 

REPORT OF SUB-COMMITTEE

 

Analysis by Sub-Committee based on the :-

Project report submitted by the Institute

Evaluation of Assessment Committee report

Presentation by the management of the Institutes, if necessary.

Recommendations of the Sub-Committee :-

 

Signature of members of

Sub-Committee